The journalism professor was not having much "fun" explaining points to she feature-writing students: "I understand so fun is wrong but I can"t tell lock why," she wrote. "So happy is right, but so fun should have "much" as the sandwich filling."

If friend ask nearly anybody under 35 even if it is "so fun" is agree English, you will most likely be said "Duh," or today"s tantamount of eye-rolling disbelief.

You are watching: Is funner a word yes or no

But if friend ask consumption authorities, you"ll obtain differing opinions. And, as is so generally the case, the answer on even if it is "so fun" is "correct" will count on the publication, the audience, and the context.

The "fun" in "so fun" ("That journey looks so fun") is acting as an adjective, the means "big" is an adjective in "That journey looks so big." Traditionally, however, "fun" is only a noun. That"s why adding the sandwich filler "much," one adjective, come render the expression as "so lot fun" provides it seem proper.

For a lengthy time, though, civilization have to be saying "I had a fun time," making use of "fun" together an adjective. ~ all, together Garner"s contemporary American Usage clues out, we have actually adjectives because that nearly every one of our various other emotions: "exciting," "fearful," "gloomy," "sad." also so, Garner"s calls "fun" together an adjective a "casualism," and also lists it only at stage 3 that the Language-Change Index, meaning many educated world use it, yet would be smart to avoid it in a university entrance essay.

The Oxford English Dictionary says "fun" began as a verb in English in 1685, possibly obtained from a variant of a verb "to befool." the was adhered to 14 years later on by the an initial use that "fun" as a noun, the OED says. Mirroring its brothers stiff upper lip, the OED go not even list one adjectival form of "fun" except as parts of various other adjectives, together in "fun-loving."

Other authorities have actually a little much more fun. A intake note in The American heritage Dictionary (fifth edition) says that "fun" together an adjective "has come to be widespread and also must be thought about standard, though writers might want to prevent it in much more formal contexts."

The thesaurus used through both The new York Times and the connected Press, Webster"s brand-new World university Dictionary (fourth edition), states "fun" as an adjective is "informal." yet how that"s applied differs in between those institutions. The new York Times hand-operated of Style and also Usage is in the OED"s corner: "Though the commercials might someday victory respectability because that fun as an adjective (a funny vacation), the gushing sound says for maintaining the word a noun."

The linked Press Stylebook is silent, despite the "Ask the Editor" archive weighs in against "funner" as "slangy."

Nearly everyone, in fact, opposes "funner "and "funnest" together anything yet kid-speak or intentional irony. ("Funniest," that course, is okay, however it doesn"t mean the exact same thing as what"s plan by "funner "or" funnest.")

If you desire to use "fun" as an adjective, think about your audience: would certainly the English teachers (or journalism professors) reading it leaving scathing comments? If so, leaving it out. Or would staying clear of it make you sound like a drip? Then walk ahead and also have part fun.

See more: Analyze How Ellen Rosen From Number The Stars, Number The Stars


*
Merrill Perlman is adjunct assistant professor in ~ the Columbia Graduate institution of Journalism and president that Merrill Perlman Consulting, supplying consulting and freelance editing and enhancing services and training in journalism, grammar and also usage. Amongst her clients room The new York Times, ProPublica and the Poynter Institute. She writes the "Language Corner" column and also blog because that Columbia Journalism Review. Merrill retired in June 2008 after 25 year at The brand-new York Times, many recently together director the copy workdesks with responsibility for controlling 150 copy editors.Click here to read much more articles through Merrill Perlman.
Interesting topic: i agree, ns would prevent "so fun" in a officially context, such as school/college writing. I would, like many British-English speakers, say/write: "It was such fun", keeping "fun" together a noun, or "It to be so lot fun". Still, "fun" is that course used as one adjective in plenty of cases: "He"s (a) fun (person) to be with"; "There are many fun things to carry out here"; "This looks fun", and so on etc. It would be fun (!) to recognize what contemporary corpora have to say in this matter. Finest wishes Len Peterson Barcelona